2021 NH Map-a-Thon's NH House Redistricting Maps
|
Important Guidance for Reading Our Maps There are two types of NH House districts, regular non-floterial districts, and floterial districts which “float” above the regular districts. (Read more at “About NH's Floterial Districts.”) The colors on each map correspond to the district details table, below.
|
This NH House maps report is Part II of the Map-a-Thon Project's proposed 2020 voting district maps. This project is supported by Open Democracy Action, the Kent Street Coalition, Granite State Progress and the League of Women Voters New Hampshire. To date, over 250 people have participated in the process, ranging from research and data collection to mapping and analysis.
Our Mapping Process is Fair & Transparent The Map-a-Thon's project is a transparent process, including the software, criteria, data sources, maps, and analysis tools. Interested citizens and legislators can replicate our maps to verify our conclusions. We welcome your efforts to try to make even better maps! Please follow the links in the report to see the maps in our software.
Map-a-Thon maps also use “communities of interest” data when possible to determine what towns should – and should not – be in a district together. These, and other techniques, should be a model for the tools a future independent redistricting commission would use to determine voting districts, replacing the current partisan model. It should be noted that use of communities of interest is limited for House maps because of the hierarchy of constitutional and court rules.
Why NH House Redistricting is Difficult – and Disappointing
Mapping NH House of Representatives districts is constrained by these factors:
-
The US and NH Constitutions
-
US & NH Supreme Court decisions
-
NH statutes
-
The high number of state representatives- 400- one of the largest democratic bodies in the world.
-
The size and location of our towns
-
Traditions which influence deviation from the ideal population, and crossing county boundaries.
These factors often force us to put smaller towns with towns large enough to have their own dedicated voting districts, and sometimes results in larger, multi-town districts.
We hope to make policy recommendations for a better process in 2030.
We are disappointed that these constraints make NH representation often less local, personal, and reflective of individual communities. Our 2020 maps do help more Granite Staters get the representation they deserve, but we have a long way to go before our voting districts are truly representational.
Send your comments & corrections to[email protected].
The data on this page is available in PDF form by downloading it at OpenDemocracyNH.com/redistricting/mapathonreport2a.pdf
Click on the County Name to Jump to the Map |
||
Belknap County
2010 NH House (Current Map) |
2020 Map-a-Thon Proposed |
|
|
|
|
|
Links to M-A-T 2020 maps in DRA 2020 software:Non-Foterial https://davesredistricting.org/join/4d360609-f12a-4a1f-b262-8881687cdc08Floterial: https://davesredistricting.org/join/bda0702e-c13d-4b6e-b5a9-55886aea57f5 |
Belknap County Details & Analysis
The small size of Belknap County, the dispersion of towns eligible for their own House districts, and the number of reps to be allocated make the county difficult to map and honor 
the NH Constitution. The ideal number of reps is 18.498, .002 from having to round to 19, the worst possible scenario. Belknap County also gained population, resulting in a smaller than average window of deviation. Because 8 of 11 towns have a population of greater than 3,444, smaller towns which need to be in districts with other towns often need to be attached to larger towns robbing them of their dedicated House district. Without Constitutional and policy changes, Belknap willl continue to be deprived of proper representation.
- 3 towns received their own districts - same as in 2010
- Smaller, compact non-floterial districts - not more than 2.5 towns (one ward in Laconia)
- Only one floterial for the county
- Meredith, Gilmanton, Tilton would have their own House districts, but disappointingly, five others would not
- Laconia was not kept intact
- The county's deviations were within +/- 5%, from -3.28 to 4.71%. Total 7.99%
Carroll County
2010 NH House (Current Map) |
2020 Map-a-Thon Proposed |
|
|
|
|
|
Links to M-A-T 2020 maps in DRA 2020 software: Non-Foterial: https://davesredistricting.org/join/15f6618d-f8c7-41d9-85a6-56cf08d482d2
Floterial: https://davesredistricting.org/join/d1dc49d7-7f4e-4be5-adfa-d765c730ee64 |
Carroll County Details & Analysis
Some improvements were made in Carroll County vs. 2010, but it is, and will be in the future, challenging. Carroll qualifies for 15 reps (county population divided by 3,444 = 14.55, rounded up to 15). However, the 14.55
adds complexity to the mapping. The southern part of Carroll County has more towns which qualify for their own House districts. The 2010 map districts both Conway and Ossipee in with smaller towns. The 2020 Map-a-Thon gives those towns their own, thus reduces violations of the NH Constitution vs. the 2010 the map, but Wolfeboro loses its own district.
The geography of two towns “force” errors on the map. Brookfield and Tuftonborough are smaller towns surrounded by larger ones. These communities need to be in a district, thus had to be paired with a larger town which should have had its own House district. Freedom and Effingham are now is a smaller district, but Sandwich and Tamworth couldn't be done in our maps, something for which residents have asked.
Two unfortunate results: Sandwich and Albany are technically contiguous, but does not meet our standards for compactness. We also created two large districts out of necessity, but advocate for smaller districts whenever possible.
Deviations for Carroll County ranges from -4.93 to 1.54 % for an overall deviation of +/- 6.47%
Cheshire County
2010 NH House (Current Map) |
2020 Map-a-Thon Proposed |
|
|
|
|
|
Links to M-A-T 2020 maps in DRA 2020 software: Non-Foterial: https://davesredistricting.org/join/e533280a-0033-443a-af7c-1baa97df1691
Floterial: https://davesredistricting.org/join/695414e9-bdec-4382-b4a5-06097c114678 |
Cheshire County Details & Analysis
Cheshire County lost a state representative seat due to a loss of population in the last 10 years, one of the reasons the map needs to be adjusted.
One of the advantages of the Map-a-Thon map includes facilitating four eligible towns to receive their own House districts, vs. two in 2010. This includes Hinsdale, Jaffrey, Ridge & Winchester. But these improvements come with baggage. Some districts are larger than 2010, and all towns are in a floterial. Reducing floterials would have resulted in even larger districts.
Three of Keene's wards were added to a floterial (3,4,5), and Ward 1 connected to other towns. Ward 2 is in a floterial with other towns.
2010's Cheshire District 1 is broken up into now in smaller districts, with a smaller in population per district, with eligible Hinsdale receiving its own dedicated House district.
Pros & Cons of this Map
Coos County
2010 NH House (Current Map) |
2020 Map-a-Thon Proposed |
|
|
|
|
|
Links to M-A-T 2020 maps in DRA 2020 software: Non-Foterial: https://davesredistricting.org/join/609e2209-13c6-446e-8fff-09f773bc047c
Floterial: https://davesredistricting.org/join/64b2fd8b-a3c6-47fd-aa3b-b4c5a01136d0 |
Coos County Details & Analysis
Map-a-Thon's 2020 proposal for Coos has zero violations of the NH Constitution for towns eligible for their own House district. There had been two towns eligible, but Lancaster lost population since 2010, and no longer qualifies.
Most of the districts now follow the roads, making it easier for legislators to travel their districts, and we have the same number of districts, but Coos did lose a seat because of population loss.
The sparsely-populated North Country unfortunately means large, sprawling districts, no matter who is doing the mapping.
The deviation ranges from -3.89 to 4.80, a total of 8.69%
Grafton County
2010 NH House (Current Map) |
2020 Map-a-Thon Proposed |
|
|
|
|
|
Links to M-A-T 2020 maps in DRA 2020 software: Non-Foterial: https://davesredistricting.org/join/fc01e1ed-4bcd-4664-8eff-02c39045a57c Floterial: https://davesredistricting.org/join/cb2db4a0-5dd1-45c5-93c5-25849acbdc4b |
Grafton County Details & Analysis
Our maps do not make significant headway on getting towns their own House districts, with the same number in both the 2010 as with our 2020 maps. Our maps have three violations, with the eligible towns of Littleton, Haverhill and Plymouth included in multi-town districts.
The Map-a-Thon maps have dedicated House districts for Canaan, Enfield .Lebanon & Hanover, and for a total of six out of nine eligible towns.
As with some of the other counties, the ideal number of reps was calculated at 26.458, making for somewhat high deviations, from – 4.67% to 4.99%, a total of 9.66% out of a possible range of 10%.
Hillsborough County
2010 NH House (Current Map) |
2020 Map-a-Thon Proposed |
|
|
|
|
|
Links to M-A-T 2020 maps in DRA 2020 software: Non-Foterial: https://davesredistricting.org/join/31c5ddc0-3a72-4ac1-bac2-57c8a5dc5f0d Floterial: https://davesredistricting.org/join/63bbb716-7f3d-4a6e-9bf6-b4b5832cc4ff |
Our Hillsborough County map made some significant improvements over 2010. There are 37 towns & city wards eligible for their own House districts(s), and the Map-a-Thon maps 
reduced the violations from eight to six for that Constitutional requirement.
New Hampshire's most populous county receives 122.81 state representatives, rounded up to 123.
Particular challenges for Hillsborough County includes the larger towns in the eastern part of the county sometimes have no choice but to have smaller towns in a district. The western end of the county has many smaller towns less than the 3,444 ideal population which need to be grouped together.
One particular problem on the 2010 map included the incredibly large district of Hudson & Pelham, Hillsborough District 37. Both towns made substantial population gains in the preceding decade, and stand at 25,826 for Hudson and 14,222. Because of its larger number of voters, Hudson candidates dominate the elections, leaving Pelham underrepresented. On the downside, the smaller but still own-district eligible Litchfield was included in a district with Hudson.
Weare, Wilton & New Ipswich, none of which had their own districts in 2010, got them in Map-a-Thon's maps. While Peterborough lost its own House district, it did get included in a district with Hancock & Antrim, all within the same ConVal School District. Antrim had previously been with Windsor and Hillsborough, despite Windsor and Hillsborough being in the Hillsborough-Deering School District.
Hillsborough Deering & Most ConVal towns are districted together Although Brookline did not get it's own district, it was put in a district in which it shares communities of interest.
Deviations for Hillsborough County ranged from -4.77 to 4.54%, with a 9.31% total deviation.
Merrimack County
2010 NH House (Current Map) |
2020 Map-a-Thon Proposed |
|
|
|
|
Links to M-A-T 2020 maps in DRA 2020 software:Non-Foterial: https://davesredistricting.org/join/b49443d2-783f-4e82-8e6b-eaf1b3199821 Floterial: https://davesredistricting.org/join/e8237b09-268c-4deb-add8-a7b2fedc5144 |
One of the biggest improvements for NH House district maps was made in Merrimack County. In 2010, there were 11 violations of the NH Constitution, but in our maps, just six. Three towns, Chichester, Canterbury, 
Dunbarton, are surrounded by larger, own-district eligible towns, forcing violations. There's nothing we can do without a change in Constitutional rules.
Merrimack receives 44.662 reps and like other counties, the distance from a whole number makes it more challenging.
Good news: Franklin is no longer connected with Northfield (floterial added); Concord is no longer districted with Hopkinton; and New London, Pittsfield, Pembroke, all get their own district. Unfortunately, though, Epson & Allenstown lose their own district
Deviations for Merrimack ranged from -4.42 to 4.74% for a total range of 9.16%.
Rockingham County
2010 NH House (Current Map) |
2020 Map-a-Thon Proposed |
|
|
|
|
|
Links to M-A-T 2020 maps in DRA 2020 software: Non-Foterial: https://davesredistricting.org/join/04213051-c1e0-4e58-adee-e0a639e29e01
Floterial: https://davesredistricting.org/join/eb3fed9e-5164-48cd-b0e2-db7bf9e255ad |
Rockingham County saw significant growth 2010 to 2020, surging from 295,223 to 314,176, so its maps have shifted significantly in some areas. It now gets 91.228 state reps.
It also has many own-seat eligible towns, plus has the geographic limitations of the seacoast border.
That said, Map-a-Thon maps show a slight improvement of two additional towns getting dedicated House districts. This includes Atkinson, Plaistow, Hampstead, Sandown & Seabrook. In working for the greater good, Epping & Raymond unfortunately lost their own district in our maps.
Three of Rockingham's violations couldn't be helped under our current Constitutional & court constraints. Newington, Newfields and New Castle are small towns surrounded by larger, own-district eligible towns, and need to be in a district with another town. That creates violations for some of the surrounding towns.
Rockingham County has a deviation range of -4.93 to 4.86%, with a total range of 9.79%.
Strafford County
2010 NH House (Current Map) |
2020 Map-a-Thon Proposed |
|
|
|
|
|
Links to M-A-T 2020 maps in DRA 2020 software: Non-Foterial: https://davesredistricting.org/join/b39e6f9e-fe24-4ebf-99cc-408cd8a8f02a
Floterial: https://davesredistricting.org/join/5536f565-ef3e-40f6-8dce-0d540daab858 |
Map-a-Thon succeeded only with a slight improvement of two additional towns getting their own districts. Disappointing was that we had to leave the district with Strafford and New Durham, which connects in the middle of the woods.
Two “forced” violations are Rollingsford and Madbury, which need to be districted with surrounding larger towns.
Towns which did get their dedicated districts were Milton & Dover, and Barrington, Lee, Rochester & Farmington kept their districts.
Deviations for Strafford are -4.93 to 4.91%,9.84% Total.
Sullivan County, NH
2010 NH House (Current Map) |
2020 Map-a-Thon Proposed |
|
|
|
|
|
Links to M-A-T 2020 maps in DRA 2020 software: Non-Foterial: Floterial: |
|
|
|
We're sorry to report that Sullivan County is the only county which has more violations for 2020 than in 2010.
Population loss led to a reduction to an apportionment of 12.504 reps, which made it measurable harder to allocate the representation over the towns. Floterials can sometimes help, but did not help in Sullivan.
Where there were two violations for eligible towns not getting their own House district in 2010, these challenges caused one more violation, AND forced us to make districts that would be larger than we would like.
The Map-a-Thon team regrets that we were not able to offer a better map. We look forward to changes, such as a larger deviation, which would allow for better districts. One scenario the team ran used an 11.9% deviation (1.9% over the norm) and it dropped Sullivan County from three violations to zero.
An increase in allowable deviation would help in Sullivan County
Deviations -4.46 to 1.31 for total 5.77.
Criteria Used for Map-a-Thon Maps
Despite what some New Hampshire legislators say publicly, drawing redistricting maps is NOT just a mathematical exercise. Fair voting maps are nonpartisan and include communities of interest whenever and wherever possible, so that towns which have important connections like school districts get put together.
Below is the criteria that the 250+ participants in the NH Map-a-Thon considered and approved. These include required U.S. and NH Constitutional mandates, court decisions, but also best practices as recommended by the Brennan Center and National Council of State Legislatures.
To see even more detail on the Map-a-Thon's criteria, visit our Redistricting Criteria work Google Sheet. We encourage you to ask the NH House Special Committee on Redistricting and the NH Senate Redistricting Committee to disclose their criteria, which they have yet to do as of Oct. 23, 2021.
NH Constitution Part 2 [Art.] 9. ...every ten years thereafter, the legislature shall make an apportionment of representatives according to the last general census of the inhabitants of the state taken by authority of the United States or of this state. In making such apportionment, no town, ward or place shall be divided nor the boundaries thereof altered. Amended 1964 providing for equal representation. [Art.] 11. [Small Towns; Representation by Districts.] When the population of any town or ward, according to the last federal census, is within a reasonable deviation from the ideal population for one or more representative seats, the town or ward shall have its own district of one or more representative seats. The apportionment shall not deny any other town or ward membership in one non-floterial representative district. When any town, ward, or unincorporated place has fewer than the number of inhabitants necessary to entitle it to one representative, the legislature shall form those towns, wards, or unincorporated places into representative districts which contain a sufficient number of inhabitants to entitle each district so formed to one or more representatives for the entire district. In forming the districts, the boundaries of towns, wards, and unincorporated places shall be preserved and contiguous. The excess number of inhabitants of district may be added to the excess number of inhabitants of other districts to form at-large or floterial districts conforming to acceptable deviations. The legislature shall form the representative districts at the regular session following every decennial federal census. Amended November 7, 2006 to enable towns with sufficient population to have their own representative district and permits the use of floterial districts.
[Art.] 26. [Senatorial Districts, How Constituted.] And that the state may be equally represented in the senate, the legislature shall divide the state into single member districts, as nearly equal as may be in population, each consisting of contiguous towns, city wards and unincorporated places, without dividing any town, city ward or unincorporated place. The legislature shall form the single member districts at its next session after approval of this article by the voters of the state and thereafter at the regular session following each decennial federal census. Amended 1964 providing for election of senators on basis of population. [Art.] 26-a. [Division of Town, Ward or Place; Senatorial Districts.] Notwithstanding Article 26 or any other article, a law providing for an apportionment to form senatorial districts under Article 26 of Part Second may divide a town, ward or unincorporated place into two or more senatorial districts if such town, ward or place by referendum requests such division. November 22, 1978
[Art.] 65. [Executive Councilor Districts Provided for.] The legislature may, if the public good shall hereafter require it, divide the state into five districts, as nearly equal as may be, governing themselves by the number of population, each district to elect a councilor: And, in case of such division, the manner of the choice shall be conformable to the present mode of election in counties. Amended 1912
U.S. Constitution, Amendment XIV, section 2 Article One of the United States Constitution, elections to the House of Representatives are held every two years, and districts are apportioned amongst the states according to their respective numbers. Congressional districts are the 435 areas from which members are elected to the U.S. House of Representatives. ... Each congressional district is to be as equal in population to all other congressional districts in a state as practicable. The Constitution provides for proportional representation in the U.S. House of Representatives and the seats in the House are apportioned based on state population according to the constitutionally mandated Census.
NH Map-a-Thon 2021 Recommended Maps & Supporting Documentation
WHAT MAKES MAP-A-THON'S NH VOTING DISTRICT MAPS FAIR
In New Hampshire, our Constitution is vague as to how new voting districts should be apportioned every 10 years, as the U.S. Constitution stipulates. Unlike other states with independent, nonpartisan commissions drawing the lines, committees are formed by the NH Speaker of the House and the NH President of the Senate. These committees reflect the partisan makeup of the whole body, which in the House in 2021 is 8 Republicans and 7 Democrats. In 2011, this process was done largely behind closed doors by the majority, with little input from either Republican or Democrat members, and what input was given by the public was ignored. As a result, Executive Council, Senate and House districts were all manipulated for partisan purposes.
In 2021, the Map-a-Thon has involved over 200 citizens from all over the state.
During Map-a-Thon I through III, the volunteers in the Map-a-Thon facilitated acquiring "Communities of Interest" data from towns around NH, then prioritized those communities of interest to guide the smaller mapping and tech team comprised of engineers, database specialists and GIS mapping experts.
In preparation for mapping, the mapping and tech team took the process further by learning the U.S. and NH Constitutional requirements, the NH Supreme Court Law, and the statute and non-statute requirements and customs. The NH Constitutional requirements, a 2006 amendment, the large number number or reps and other factors make meeting the Constitutional mandates for the NH House make it particularly difficult. However, Map-a-Thon volunteers have made significant advances without gerrymandering, in stark contrast to past efforts of the Special Committee on Redistricting.
Before you review the maps
There are a few things for you to know about the challenges of drawing voting district maps in New Hampshire. Some of these challenges have also been used to hide manipulation of districts for partisan advantage, so Granite Staters should understand how the process works.
- Check out our Fair Redistricting Workshop on YouTube, featuring Yurij Rudensky of the Brennan Center, one of the nation's leading authorities in a fair redistricting process. You'll learn about the building blocks of fair, nonpartisan redistricting.
- The NH House Special Committee on Redistricting website - Contains the limited documentation made public in 2011, and the NH Supreme Court ruling. It does not provide insight into the proprietary software that the Special Committee will be using for NH House Districts. Notably, this website does not include the criteria being used for the 2020 maps.
- The NH Constitution, part 2, Article 9 & 11 and 2006 Constitutional amendment "Amended November 7, 2006 to enable towns with sufficient population to have their own representative district and permits the use of floterial districts." The sufficient population number in 2010 was 3,291, and in 2020 was 3,444. In 2011, 152 towns were eligible, but 62 of those towns did not receive their own House District, violating the Constitution as amended.
- The NH Supreme Court's 2002 Ruling on the "Aggregate Method" vs. the "Component Method" of Calculating Floterial Districts -- The NH Supreme Court took issue with the traditional method of residual population and recommended the "Component Method" to better allocate representation in floterial districts. In combination with the 2006 NH Constitutional Amendment, using this method to calculate floterial districts, limited the number of towns which could mathematically receive their own regular House district.
See the Map-a-Thon's Citizen-Drawn Voting Maps for NH
New Hampshire's U.S. Congressional Districts
New Hampshire's Executive Council Districts
New Hampshire's State Senate Districts
New Hampshire's State House Districts
Open Democracy Book Club
In 2020, in some of the darkest days of the COVID pandemic, one of our Open Democracy Team members proposed an "Open Democracy Book Club." To our surprise, 300 citizens registered for the first book and discussion in January. Certainly, the pandemic gave us some time at home to read, but the hunger to learn about the problems and how to fix them was there already. Our Book club now has more than 650 members!
Our Mission
Each time we address these three guiding questions about our democracy through the books chosen:
Where are we?
How did we get here?
What do we do about it?
Help us select Open Democracy Book Club’s 2025 selections - here!
Four times a year we read and discuss a new book. When possible, we have the author speak for 30 minutes. Then we are divided into breakout rooms for small group discussions, returning to the main group at the end to share ideas and pool resources. Everyone is welcome to participate, whether or not you have had a chance to read the book.
To Join the Book Club - Sign Up Below
You will be added to the Open Democracy Book Club email list, where members receive updates about upcoming books, guests, and discussion questions.
We are on our third book in the 2024 season! (NOTE: We will be taking the summer off)
On September at 7pm we will review and discuss Democracy in Black: How Race Still Enslaves the American Soul, by Eddie S. Glaude, Jr. RSVP HERE
Previous Books
- April 11, 2024 Unthinkable: Trauma, Truth, and the Trials of American Democracy*, by Jamie Raskin
- January 16, 2024 The Scheme: How the Right Wing Used Dark Money to Capture the Supreme Court, by Sheldon Whitehouse and Jennifer Mueller
- September 14, 2023 Becoming A Democracy, How We can Fix the Electoral College, Gerrymandering and Our Elections* by Kristin Eberhard
- June 13, 2023 One Person, No Vote by Carol Anderson
- April 13, 2023 Who Stole The American Dream?* Hedrick Smith
- January 17, 2023 Democracy Vouchers* by Tom Latkowski
- Sept 15, 2022 Daring Democracy: Igniting Power, Meaning, and Connection for the America We Want* with Frances Moore Lappé & Adam Eichen
- June 9, 2022 The Sum of Us: What Racism Costs Everyone and How We Can Prosper Together by Heather McGhee
- April 14, 2022 How Democracies Die by Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt
- Jan 13, 2022 Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right’s Stealth Plan for America* with Nancy MacLean
- Oct 14, 2021 Our Time is Now by Stacey Abrams
- May 27, 2021 The Politics of Joy (and Sacrifice): The Fearless Walks and Historic Talks of Doris ‘Granny D’ Haddock*, a compilation of inspiring speeches given by Doris with Dennis Burke
- Apr 15, 2021 They Don't Represent Us* with Lawrence Lessig
- March 4, 2021 Unrigged: How Americans Are Battling Back to Save Democracy* with David Daley
- January 21, 2021 Corporations are Not People: Reclaiming Democracy from Big Money and Global Corporations* with Jeff Clements
*Denotes author participation
Recordings of previous book club meetings here.
Sign upNashua Board of Alderman 2021
We need you to contact your Nashua Aldermen and Alderwomen about the passing Nashua's version of the NH Resolution for Fair Nonpartisan Redistricting.
Here is a link 
to a PDF of the resolution being proposed by Alderwoman Jan Schmidt: Nashua Resolution Our thanks to Alderwoman Schmidt for bringing this forward.
Speak or Submit Written Testimony
Two meeting dates are coming up, if you wish to attend or speak to support the resolution. It appears that Nashua does TV broadcasts of the meetings, but not Zoom or online interactive access.
Monday, April 5, 2021, 7 p.m.: Speak, or submit written testimony, to June M. Caron, Chair, Personnel/Administrative Affairs Committee (If you wish to speak the mic will be open after the opening (best time) and at closing (still fine)
Tuesday, April 13, 2021, 7:30 p.m.: Comes before the full Board of Aldermen, speak or submit written testimony to Donna L. Graham, Legislative Affairs Manager. (Best time to speak is at the beginning)
Send an Email to Committee Members
Here is sample language for your email, but please use this as a guide and make the email authentically from you. We suggest you email your alderman/woman, plus the members of the Personnel/Administrative Affairs Committee.
Dear Alderman/woman _____________:
I just heard that the Board of Alderman will be hearing a resolution supporting fair nonpartisan and transparent redistricting. Versions of the NH Resolution for Fair Nonpartisan Redistricting have now passed in 44 towns, including the cities of Lebanon, Keene, Franklin, Dover and Durham.
I think this is important because even though the City of Nashua does fair ward districts, the state's track record for fair voting maps isn't as commendable. There seems to be something about going to serve in Concord that makes our leaders sometimes forget that they work for the people, not the parties. I'm one voter who thinks that we need a level playing field for this, so that voters can vote and know that the system isn't rigged for one party or the other. 
Please commit the City of Nashua to drawing its own fair districts, and make sure our state legislators and the Special Committee on Redistricting are put on notice, too.
Thank you for your service to our city!
Your Name
Your Address
Nashua
Other talking points:
- This is a NONPARTISAN resolution that has passed in Red towns and Blue towns
- Partisan data should not be used to manipulate the voting maps
- When voting districts are manipulated, the voters don't get the representation that they should for their area
- Voters in gerrymandered districts get frustrated and apathetic, and give up on voting, because it doesn't matter
- Voting districts should be compact, have "communities of interest" like school districts, neighborhoods, or economies
- Some of our elected officials say there isn't any gerrymandering, but not all gerrymandering has squiggly lines! Look at Hudson, 24,000 population & Pelham, 13,000 population, combined in one district, but each should have its own representatives.
- All the voters want -- of any party or independent -- is a fair, nonpartisan and transparent process.
Nashua Board of Aldermen, as of March 2021
* = Members of the Personnel/Administrative Affairs Committee, where Nashua's Resolution for Fair Nonpartisan Redistricting will be heard.
*JUNE M. CARON, Ward 7, [email protected]
*BEN CLEMONS , Alderman at Large, [email protected]
RICHARD A. DOWD , Ward 2, [email protected]
LINDA HARRIOTT-GATHRIGHT, Ward 9, [email protected]
ELIZABETH LU, Ward 6, [email protected]
ERNEST A. JETTE , Ward 5, [email protected]
*SHOSHANNA KELLY , Alderwoman at Large, [email protected]
PATRICIA KLEE, Ward 3, [email protected]
BRANDON MICHAEL LAWS, Alderman at Large, [email protected]
*THOMAS LOPEZ , Ward 4, [email protected]
MICHAEL B. O'BRIEN, SR , VP Board of Aldermen, [email protected]
*SKIP CLEAVER , Ward 8, [email protected]
JAN SCHMIDT , Ward 1, [email protected] ****Sponsor of the NH Resolution for Fair Nonpartisan Redistricting****
DAVID C. TENCZA , Alderman at Large, [email protected]
LORI WILSHIRE, President, Board of Aldermen, [email protected]
2021 Redistricting Forum Handouts
Our speakers and organizers have prepared additional materials for you if you'd like to explore our topics on redistricting and gerrymandering in more detail:
| Topic | Speaker(s) | Speaker(s) | Additional Materials |
| Welcome & Program Notes | Olivia Zink, Executive Director, Open Democracy | Louise Spencer, co-founder, Kent Street Coalition | |
| Keynote Message | Ellen Freiden, Fair Districts Florida, on the successful constitutional amendment for an Independent Redistricting Commission |
YouTube of Ellen Freidin's TEDX talk: https://youtu.be/ka1RkguwSqs |
|
| Basics of Redistricting and the National Landscape |
Kyri Claflin, member, Kent Street Coalition, short video by Vox, "The Man Who Rigged America's Election Maps." |
"The man who rigged America’s election maps” —
Graphic of types of redistricting
|
|
| The history of redistricting in NH, what happened in 2011, the NH Supreme Court, and the U.S. Supreme Court | Liz Tentarelli, President, League of Women Voters - NH | Former NH Senator Sylvia Larson, Rep. Lucy Weber, Rep. Ned Gordon | |
| Break | |||
| The Special Committee on Redistricting: What it does, its Politics, and the criteria that will be used |
Liz Tentarelli, President, League of Women Voters - NH
|
Members of the 2011 or 2021 Special Committee on Redistricting Member of both 2011 & 2021 SCR, Rep. Lucy Weber, and
|
Redistricting Criteria from National Conference of State Legislatures Redistricting Criteria from the Brennan Center |
| The technology of redistricting | Moon Duchin, or a member of the Tufts Univ. MGGG Redistricting Lab | Districtr.org | |
|
Messaging strategies & proposed tactics: The words matter! Talking points: Partisan Redistricting vs. Gerrymandering; Towns without House Rep districts. Transparency, fair elections, so public and municipal officials have input into the districts. |
Brian Beihl, Deputy Director, Open Democracy Action |
Zandra Rice Hawkins, Executive Director, Granite State Progress Louise Spencer, co-founder, Kent Street Coalition |
|
|
Get involved in a working group or team! April 29, LWV National Day of Action Support the NH Resolution for Fair Nonpartisan Redistricting Getting your own state rep district Contacting the Special Committee on Redistricting Write a personal letter/email to your state rep to support fair redistricting
|
Brian Beihl, Deputy Director, Open Democracy Action explaining the Action Page. Liz Tentarelli, President, League of Women Voters - NH: National Day of Action on April 29 Louise Spencer, co-founder, Kent Street Coalition, on getting involved in actions, and the importance of working locally, but also being connected. |
|
|
| Wrap up and Thanks! | Olivia Zink, Executive Director, Open Democracy, | Louise Spencer, co-founder, Kent Street Coalition |
NH Resolution for Fair Nonpartisan Redistricting
Thank you for visiting to learn more about New Hampshire's redistricting process, and the NH Resolution for Fair Nonpartisan Redistricting.
The Basics of Redistricting & Gerrymandering
In short, redistricting is an every-ten-year process that takes the U.S. Census data, and reapportions the population into more-or-less equal voting districts for state elected positions like the Executive Council, State Senate, and State House. It also includes the two U.S. House of Representatives seats for NH, as well as for county commissioner.
By current state law, the NH House is responsible for most of the redistricting, with the NH Senate doing the Congressional districts. The process is 
supposed to be fair, nonpartisan, and transparent to the public. Fair voting districts are geographic areas of close to equal population. Voters in those districts should have something in common, such as a school district, perhaps a lake, or a common economy. Our legislature appoints a "special committee" which reflects the percentage of legislators that each party got elected. That committee draws the voting maps, has public hearings and submits them to the full legislature for a vote.
Voting maps should NOT be drawn on the basis or race, religion, ethnicity or political party, or between areas which have nothing in common, or perhaps competing interests. When maps are drawn using this data are often are manipulated to cheat, and control the outcome of elections for the party in charge at the time. The graphic at right shows how this is done, called "gerrymandering."
What Happened in 2011
In 2011, a legislature hostile to fair, nonpartisan redistricting drafted new voting districts which gerrymandered dozens of NH towns, as detailed in the articles below. The Special Committee had no real part in the process; the maps were in fact drawn by a small group of legislators out of the sight of the public, using a software that was kept hidden from the public and even Democratic members of the committee. When public hearings were held around the state, there were no maps shown to the public or most state legislators. When state rep district maps were finally available, the NH House had only one week to review them, and the public only had 24 hours! There
was little transparency in the process.
- Concord Monitor, Dec. 15, 2011: Politics-Election Redistricting plan unveiled
- New Hampshire Public Radio, June 7, 2017: How Gerrymandering Skewed the 2016 Elections
- NH Union Leader- Coming soon
- NH Supreme Court: Brief by NH Senator David Pierce
- League of Women Voters in the NH Union Leader: NH Voices: Liz Tentarelli -- Learning from the past
Gerrymandering Could Get Worse in 2021
In 2021, there's a very good chance that this gerrymandering could get worse, not better, unless voters speak up and make sure that legislators know that the voters demand a FAIR, NONPARTISAN and TRANSPARENT process. Without the proposed permanent solution of an "independent redistricting commission," which passed the legislature with bipartisan votes but was vetoed twice, we again are depending on the good consciences of our state legislators.
Passing the NH Resolution for Fair Nonpartisan Redistricting
While we would prefer to push for a permanent independent redistricting commission, that is unlikely to happen in time for the 2021 redistricting. So instead we are passing the NH Resolution for Fair, Nonpartisan Redistricting in as many towns as possible.
Read the sample Town Meeting/SB 2 Vote version
Read the sample City/Town Council version
Between Dec 2020 and early February 2021, volunteers working with Open Democracy and other organizations around the state will be proposing "petitioned warrant articles" in 100 town-meeting & SB 2 towns around the state. In cities, volunteers will be working with city councils and boards of aldermen. In both types of government, we will be asking for a non-binding resolution to be sent to our state elected officials. We're asking a town's voters to:
- Demand fairness and transparency in the process of drawing new maps
- Require that maps be drawn with no favoritism to one party or the other
- Make sure that the mapping process happens in public meetings
- That towns of 3300 citizens or larger be given their own state representative districts, rather than being split with other towns.
- And that the board of selectmen from that town communicate in writing the wishes of the town to the State and Federal delegations.
We have more details on our Town Meeting "How-To" page, or if you live in a city or a town with a town council, our Council Resolution page, but this initiative is designed to use our local town warrants to inform local voters on the evils of gerrymandering, and pressure our legislature to put party politics aside and create nonpartisan voting districts for state representative, NH senator, executive council, and U.S. Congress. The voters want fairness, but politicians want power. As a voter, it should be YOU calling the shots!
If you have further questions about the NH Resolution for Fair Nonpartisan Redistricting in your town, or want to pass a resolution in your town, contact Open Democracy's deputy director, Brian Beihl, for more information. 
Home
Open Democracy is working to achieve political equality for all.
We envision a government accountable to the people, free from the influence of wealthy special interest groups.
With your help, we will:
1. Establish small donor, voter-owned honest elections
2. End gerrymandering and modernize voting
3. Eradicate Super PACs & neutralize Citizens United
4. Expose unlimited, anonymous Dark Money
5. Eliminate Pay-to-Play lobbyist & contractor donations
6. Enforce campaign finance laws & close loopholes
Join us!
- Volunteer, or join a regional Open Democracy Team! Right now, protecting our democracy needs you to speak up, and to take action.
- Give a one-time or recurring gift to help support our mission, if you're unable to take action. This helps us organize others and expand the chorus of voices for reform! You can also mail us a check to "Coalition for Open Democracy": 4 Park Street, Suite 301, Concord, NH 03301
We welcome your questions and ideas! Please contact us anytime:
Open Democracy
4 Park Street, Suite 301
Concord, NH 03301
[email protected]
(603) 715-8197
Follow us:
